The controversy surrounding the Olympics has left me sighing everytime its brought up.Thankfully,the Indian leg of the Olympic torch- run went peacefully.The 2.3km route was completed in 35 minutes while almost whole of Delhi came to a standstill.A record number of security officials,twice the number of those found on Republic Day,guarded the area .This preparation seems to have irked a few sportsmen who decided to opt out, citing stifling conditions.

So was it wrong to have such a high degree of protection? In my opinion, Id rather compromise on a bit of freedom than have a Paris or a London.Even those fortunate enough to carry the flame proclaimed that the moment the torch found its way into their hands the security in place just faded into insignificance-keeping the flame alive was all they could think of.

The Indian Government needs to be applauded for carrying out a smooth affair.It was an ideal balance-while protection was in place to let the flame pass on in true spirit without the interference of unwanted elements,those who felt strongly about the china invasion were allowed to carry out their own alternative procession to voice there opinion. Sportsmanship spirit was upheld.The highlight of the day would have to be Peas and Bhupathi lighting the cauldron together leaving aside their personal differences and placing sports above all.

But has the Olympic spirit been scarred?Does it deserve to be boycotted?I am keen to know how you feel.Please use the link below to my poll and let your opinion be known(Its anonymous)

Should Olympics be boycotted?
( surveys)